Friday, February 12, 2016

Massive stock buybacks: it’s a shame


Big companies are squandering their cash reserves to prop up their stock prices.

The stock market dropped almost 9.5% in January, its worst start of any year on record.
Of course, every time a stock is traded, there’s a buyer and a seller. So, who was buying in January when the sellers were pushing prices down?

Goldman Sachs Group says U.S. companies were buying their own shares with corporate cash reserves, accounting for about 20 percent of market volume last month.

That’s stunning. American companies have a couple trillion dollars sitting in their cash accounts, and they can’t think of anything better to do with it. The money could have been used for new product development, expansion and job creation, training and productivity enhancements or other productive purposes.

Yahoo Finance says hundreds of S&P 500 companies have lost $126 billion in the past three years by investing in their own shares and then watching the share price go down. Some of these firms actually borrowed money to cover their share repurchases. By the way, the stock market overall was up 39 percent in the same period.


Why are all these companies using their cash with such awful results? The standard wisdom is that companies buy their own shares when the stock price is “cheap,” below their actual value as determined by the company. This reduces cash outflow for dividends, and makes more shares available for stock grants and options as part of executive compensation plans.

Another result is that earnings per share (EPS) are increased when there are fewer outstanding shares, and this looks good in corporate reports and also may boost executive compensation.

Let’s call the spade a spade, here. Corporate directors and CEOs are spending their hoarded cash to try to prop up share prices—often for their own benefit—instead of using the money for constructive corporate purposes that would preserve and expand jobs.

Shame on them.









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

The gotchas and the gliblies



Regardless of your pick of the unprecedented crowd of celebrities now running for president, I suspect you’ll agree with me that the news media have failed most dishonorably to report on the relevant public policy issues in this campaign season.

Instead, the media have almost monolithically homed in on the gotcha moments and stayed focused on the gotcha moments.

The media have glibly reported on the most facile stump speeches and the most offensive ad hominem attacks and the most despicably false statements, without injecting any leavening dose of honesty and rebuke.

I have never believed that the news media actually, effectively perform any of the “public watchdog” functions that are so widely claimed by media moguls and their apologists.

The news media certainly aren’t doing America any favors during this campaign.












Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, February 5, 2016

You already know this






It’s the least expensive cat toy in the world.








Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Yeah, a blanket fort



Did you make one of these when you were a kid?




I did. Many times.

If you didn’t make one when you were a kid, you can make up for that by helping your grandchildren make one.

Today.

Or make one for yourself.









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Ars Poetica, the art of Horace



Thinkers and writers and philosophers have been talking about poetry for thousands of years—notwithstanding, we continue to puzzle and prate and pontificate about the nature of this, perhaps, most classical of the arts.

I’m doing much reading about poetry. I wish I could say that it’s an entirely pleasant learning experience.

Take a moment to reflect on this commentary by Horace (Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65-8 B.C.):

“…the poet [should] just now say what ought just now to be said…In the choice of his words, too, the author of the projected poem must be delicate and cautious, he must embrace one and reject another: you will express yourself eminently well, if a dexterous combination should give an air of novelty to a well-known word…”
(From Ars Poetica, c. 15 B.C.)

Exactly so. In my poems, I strive to find the right words to profoundly express what’s in my mind and in my eye and in my ear. I want to offer my sensations most fully to the reader.

Here’s a sample:

Listen

Surf sounds, the singing of the sea,
the breaking rollers,
mellowed crunch of wave on wave,
the boistered drumroll of eternal tides.

There is no silent sea, we think….

….consider a sheltered beach,
in the lee of a baffling sand bar,
sea-spawned shoal,
mediator for sea and shore,
muffler of the surf,
tamper of the borning breakers,
damper of the singing of the sea,
guardian of truth about
the vastly silent blue water.



Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.
Published in The Australia Times Poetry Magazine and in Whispers







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

The few have spoken in Iowa



Just for the record, about 6 out of 7 eligible voters in Iowa didn’t bother to vote Monday night.

For every hardy soul who turned up at the Iowa caucuses, there were 676 adults in America who didn’t vote for Hilary or Ted or any of the others.

In other words, more or less the tiniest fraction of all of us did the voting in Iowa. They did their thing, but they didn’t speak for you or me.

By the way, He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named got a tad over 45,000 votes, meaning that on Monday night, less than two-hundredths of one percent of potential U. S. voters wanted a reality TV star to be president.


Wait ‘til you see the teeny-weeny numbers for New Hampshire.

Too many of us don’t bother to vote. It’s the cancer of democracy.











Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Monday, February 1, 2016

Book review: America Ascendant


Stanley B. Greenberg, America Ascendant: A Revolutionary Nation’s Path to Addressing Its Deepest Problems and leading the 21st Century
New York: Thomas Dunne Books, St. Martin’s Press, 2015
406 pages



Doubtless you’ve been wondering what’s going on in American politics, our Congress, our state governments and the Republican Party. Greenberg offers many answers in America Ascendant.

He expects we are witnessing the slow unraveling of what ails our body politic: civil dysfunction, the concentration of greed/power/wealth, the conspicuously parochial Republican/conservative/rightwing points of view, and the blatant bigotry that too often masks itself with dissembling, righteous talk of “traditional” American “values” like self-reliance, commitment to family, Jeffersonian “small government” and religious faith. Greenberg expects that better days are coming, but he cautions that the process will be achingly and devastatingly slow.



His essential message is that America is inexorably becoming a less white and more diverse nation—most abundantly, a nation of immigrants, and a nation undeniably represented by young generations of folks who are tolerant and happy to live their lives with culturally and racially and sexually diverse friends, lovers, marriage partners, neighbors and coworkers—the folks who consciously wish to live their lives unfettered by the domination of a select few with great wealth and great power.

To those of us who have struggled to understand the motivations and fears and dreams of the folks who support the divisive and hurtful and dangerous and self-interested antics of so many politicians, America Ascendant offers much more understanding than I have encountered from any other source.

What Greenberg says is not pretty. His book suggests that a good outcome is possible.

I want to believe his message.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Sunday, January 31, 2016

I didn’t bother on Thursday night


About 225 million grownups in America didn’t watch the Republican debate or He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named last Thursday night. I was one of them.

The audience for the GOP debate on Fox was 12.5 million, about 5% of adults in the U.S. Roughly 2.7 million—about 1%--tuned in to the DJT event benefitting military veterans.

The rest of us were doing other things: hoping the next president will use the full powers of the Oval Office to do good things for America, like improving education, boosting infrastructure investment and creating jobs, reducing carbon emissions to tackle the global climate change horror, increasing taxes on the very wealthy, taking steps to fight the greedy power of corporations and Wall Street….




You fill in the hopes I forgot to mention….














Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Phase transition



Transition….








My path, my crossings,
   the trails I know, and my friends,
      become memories…




Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2014
All rights reserved.





The memories piled up.

The pile got smaller.

I am happily in a new place. I have happy memories of the old place.

And no regrets.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

What it doesn’t say….



I’m pretty sure that a lot of folks thought teaching was a proper job for women in 1915 in Sacramento.

Of course, there weren’t a lot of other career paths open to women who wanted to work, or needed to work.

I wonder what women thought about applying for a teaching job, and, of course, complying with the rules and regulations. At least, judging by this example, teachers had a more or less free rein in deciding what and how they should teach.




Wait a minute. I just noticed it doesn’t say anything about romping naked with wild animals in public. Does that mean….?







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Monday, January 25, 2016

Another poet heard from….(part 9)



Naomi Shihab Nye offers some deft strokes in her poetry, and I’d like to tell you about one of them….

This post has been moved to my website:

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Technology ‘R’ Us


Often we don’t have a really explicit idea of what we mean when we say “We’ve come a long way….”

For instance, 130 years ago doing the household laundry was a bona fide chore—it was hard work. 

Why? In 1886 a study estimated that “washing, boiling and rinsing a single load of laundry used about 50 gallons of water.”

So what? Think about it: in the days before indoor plumbing, somebody (think Mom and the kids) had to haul that water from some source outside the house, maybe a pump, maybe a well, maybe a nearby spring or waterway.

That’s 8-10 trips—or more—to haul enough water for the wash, almost enough water to fill an oil drum.



That’s just to do the white and light-colored stuff. Think about doing it again for the dark load.

Things did get better, but slowly. By 1940, roughly 40 percent of homes had heating (not from a fireplace or stove), about 60 percent had flush toilets indoors, 70 percent had water coming out of a tap inside the house and a whopping 80 percent had electricity.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

We’re cooking the planet (part 13)


We’ve already inflicted long-term damage to the atmosphere of our planet, and we piled it on last year:

Scientists have confirmed that 2015 was the hottest year on record in the 136 years that useful records have been kept.


We have to take immediate steps to shut down coal mines and phase out the use of dirty, dangerous coal. We need to make gasoline-powered vehicles much more efficient. We need to require that users pay the true economic cost of creating pollution. We need to continue expanding our use of renewable energy.

This is the only planet our grandchildren will have to live on.

Let’s do everything we can do to clean it up.








Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Donkey and elephant enter politics


Ever wondered about the origin of the Democratic donkey and the Republican elephant?

Thank Thomas Nast, the 19th century political cartoonist for Harper’s Weekly.


Think back 146 years, to January 1870, when Nast drew a cartoon titled “A Live Jackass Kicking a Dead Lion.” He used the jackass/donkey to depict Democratic newspapers in the South, savaging Edwin Stanton, who had been Lincoln’s Secretary of War.

About four years later, Nast drew a bloated and berserk elephant to represent the Republican electorate during a political brouhaha about the prospect that President Ulysses Grant might run for a third term (he didn’t).

Imagine what Nast might have done with YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram….









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

The barrel is worth more than the oil


The price of crude oil dropped below $28 a barrel this week. That meant that the metal oil barrel cost more than the oil.

Some barrels can be cleaned and used again. I couldn’t determine how many barrels are used only once to transport oil.

The astounding decline in the market price of crude since summer 2014 has many causes, including shrinking demand and increasing supply.

Of course, the drop from $115 a barrel is partly—perhaps significantly—the result of speculators who drove the price up and then let it fall for reasons that have nothing to do with economics or market forces.

At $115 a barrel, oil was selling for 3 or 4 times as much as it cost to get it out of the ground.
Just wacky. We need sensible regulation of financial speculators who can distort the price of the world’s most important commodity.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Preschool school: is it the right thing?


I have preschool kids in my family, and I’m going to read this book:
Erika Christakis, The Importance of Being Little: What Preschoolers Really Need From Grownups, to be published in a few weeks.

Obviously I’m not reviewing the book here, but sample some quotes from the author’s recent piece in The Atlantic, “The New Preschool Is Crushing Kids.”

“The academic takeover of American early learning can be understood as a shift from what I would call an ‘ideas-based curriculum’ to a ‘naming-and-labeling-based curriculum.’ Not coincidentally, the latter can be delivered without substantially improving our teaching force. Inexperienced or poorly supported teachers are directed to rely heavily on scripted lesson plans for a reason: We can point to a defined objective, and tell ourselves that at least kids are getting something this way.

“…One major study of 700 preschool classrooms in 11 states found that only 15 percent showed evidence of effective interactions between teacher and child…We neglect vital teacher-child interactions at our peril. Although the infusion of academics into preschool has been justified as a way to close the achievement gap between poor and well-off children, Robert Pianta, one of the country’s leading child-policy experts, cautions that there is “no evidence whatsoever” that our early-learning system is suited to that task. He estimates that the average preschool program ‘narrows the achievement gap by perhaps only 5 percent’…


“…Contrasting the dismal results of Tennessee’s preschool system with the more promising results in places such as Boston, which promotes active, child-centered learning (and, spends more than twice the national average on preschool), lends further credence to the idea that preschool quality really does matter.

“…when I’ve visited Finland, I’ve found it impossible to remain unmoved by the example of preschools where the learning environment is assessed, rather than the children in it. Having rejected many of the pseudo-academic benchmarks that can, and do, fit on a scorecard, preschool teachers in Finland are free to focus on what’s really essential: their relationship with the growing child.

“Here’s what the Finns, who don’t begin formal reading instruction until around age 7, have to say about preparing preschoolers to read: ‘The basis for the beginnings of literacy is that children have heard and listened … They have spoken and been spoken to, people have discussed [things] with them … They have asked questions and received answers.’ “

I talk to my grandchildren. A lot. They talk to me. We like to tell stories.

It’s good for me, and I’m pretty sure it’s good for them.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Your pedestrian ancestors


Imagine living the rest of your life without your car.

Hold on, breathe!  I didn’t say “without your cell phone,” I only mentioned “car.”

In 1903 most people weren’t even thinking “car,” let alone “cell phone.” Most people walked to where they wanted to go, most of the time.

Here’s a slightly blotchy video of downtown Boston more than 100 years ago, with a couple streetcars, lots of horse-drawn vehicles and stunning throngs of people on the move on the sidewalks. Look at how much clothing they’re wearing. Look at the blobs of horse hockey on the street.

The cameraman passes the Jordan Marsh store, and travels on Boylston Street to Copley Square and the Boston Public Library.

Even without cars, look at the traffic!

Notice there aren’t any parking spaces. I guess nobody ever parked really, the streetcars and carriages just stopped long enough to let passengers get on or off.

Boston firemen and their nags in 1900

It’s estimated there were 21.5 million horses and mules in the United States in 1900, about 1 horse/mule for every three people. (Today, about 6.9 million horses for 323 million people, a horse/people ratio of about 1:47).

Of course, this silent film doesn’t convey any sense of the smell on city streets. Imagine what 14,000 horses in 1903 Boston could do to the fragrance of the downtown. About 33 horses can produce a ton of horse stuff daily, so think about 425 tons of manure dropping to the streets of Boston every day. Carting the horse manure out of town was a big business.

Horses were a big business in many ways. In 1900 in Boston, there were 105 carriage dealers, 99 harness makers, 51 hay dealers, 30 wheelwrights, 238 horseshoers and 192 livery, boarding and sales stables.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, January 16, 2016

“Gov. Haley, I have a followup question….”



The Republican governor of South Carolina, Nikki Haley, said this to reporters recently:

"…we've never in the history of this country passed any laws or done anything based on race or religion. Let's not start that now.”

Wow. Maybe she momentarily forgot about slavery and Jim Crow.

There are almost 1.3 million black residents of South Carolina, almost one-third of the population.

Today’s quiz:
How many black voters in the Palmetto State will vote for Gov. Haley when she runs for re-election in 2018?


p.s. I had promised myself that I would not raise my voice to recognize the poltroonery that passes for politicking these days, but Haley's comment is remarkably egregious and I cannot let it pass.


Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Eight-year-old kids go on strike


The abuses of child labor are no longer a big issue in America. Child labor was a big deal in the latter part of the 19th century.

The Industrial Revolution came to America as early as 1813, when the first water-powered textile mill opened in Waltham, MA. Within a few decades, mills and factories were sprouting along waterways everywhere, and workers streamed off the farms to join immigrants who were employed in them at low wages.


The ongoing abuses of child laborers were condemned (by unionized adults) as early as the 1830s. In the following decades, regulation of the working conditions for kids occurred piece-meal, state by state. By the end of the 19th century, 28 states had enacted laws governing (but now outlawing) the working hours and conditions for children. Work by youngsters was finally outlawed in America when the Fair Labor Standards Act was passed in 1938.

In 1881 eight-year-old textile workers in Maine—some of them working for eight cents a day-- started a strike when they discovered that kids their age at another mill were making a penny more per day. The three-day strike was partly successful.

Mill owners and factory owners and other 19th century capitalists were forced, over time, to cease exploitation of poor kids on the shop floor.



Imagine that you work in the Cabot Mill (see right) making textile products. Imagine that you take your eight-year-old son to work with you every day, so he can work for 10-12 hours for pennies in grimy conditions, with poor lighting, breathing air filled with cotton lint and climbing barefoot on the huge humming machinery so he can replace the empty spindles.

Imagine that you need his paltry income to keep food on the table for your family.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.