Funny thing happened on the way to
the latest round of teacher evaluations….
Nothing changed.
By definition, technically, half of
all teachers are "below average," and yet the kind of teacher you
don't want your kid to get seems to be all but impossible to identify….
At the risk of exaggerating
slightly, not too long ago nearly every state had a carnival sideshow called
"teacher evaluation" that basically rated every teacher as
"good" or "satisfactory" or "competent" or
whatever the top of scale was….it was more or less impossible to get a
"bad" rating, so it was more or less impossible to expose or get rid
of unsatisfactory or incompetent teachers.
Let's face it: as an example, you
could say that the "worst 10%" of teachers were out there somewhere,
but officially they were invisible.
Now the New York Times reports that
more than half of our states have implemented new systems for teacher
evaluations, in many cases linking student performance and test scores to an
individual teacher's performance assessment.
In Florida, 97% of teachers are
"effective" or "highly effective."
In Tennessee, 98% of teachers are
"at expectations."
In Michigan, 98% of teachers are
"effective or better."
For the record, I love and respect good teachers. I am a teacher.
But, gee. Makes you wonder….
If we admit that, by definition,
half of all teachers are "below average," then just exactly how
astoundingly unspeakably incompetent does a teacher have to be to get a poor
rating in Florida, or Tennessee, or Michigan?
If you believe these assessment
results, then round up your kids and move to any school district in Florida, or
Tennessee, or Michigan, and thank your lucky stars they're going to get a good
education.