Showing posts with label Climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate change. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

"Out of the mouths of babes...."


So, here’s the story:

The 8-year-old asked his father to start recycling in the household.

Indulgent father, chuckling, asked “Why?”

He replied: “So you can help me save the planet.”

Indulgence was extended. “And why do you want me to save the planet” said father.

“Because that's where I keep all my stuff," he said.

                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~





It’s the only planet our grandkids will have to live on.

Let’s commit now to the hard work and the expense of cleaning it up.


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Don’t vote for Johnson or Stein “to make a statement”



Paul Krugman laid it right out in yesterday’s New York Times:
"Nobody cares” if you vote for Johnson or Stein on November 8 because you want to raise the middle digit to "the system."

Krugman’s key point: Clinton or Trump will be the next president of the United
States, so “don’t vote for a minor-party candidate [just] to make a statement. Nobody cares.”

Rightly enough, he says that if you really think Johnson or Stein, and the platforms of the Libertarian  Party or the Green Party, are right for America and they should have the power of the presidency, then by all means vote for one of them.

But. Seriously.

Krugman bets that many Johnson/Stein supporters are mostly anti-Trump/anti-Clinton kinds of people, who haven’t read those party platforms and really haven’t thought through the consequences of Johnson or Stein getting to redecorate the Oval Office.

Here’s Krugman summarizing the Libertarian platform:
“…it calls for abolition of the income tax and the privatization of almost everything the government does, including education. What really struck me, however, was what the platform says about the environment.
It opposes any kind of regulation; instead, it argues that we can rely on the courts. Is a giant corporation poisoning the air you breathe or the water you drink? Just sue: ‘Where dam­ages can be proven and quantified in a court of law, restitution to the injured parties must be required.’ Ordinary citizens against teams of high-priced corporate lawyers — what could go wrong?”

Here’s my simple summary of the Green platform:
It's chock full of really good, really feel-good, and mostly unrealistic ideas that have nothing in particular to do with world trade or job creation or infrastructure investment or effective regulation of the financial markets or health care reform or bipartisan government or…..

Neither Johnson nor Stein is going to win the election.

If you strongly endorse elements of either or both of these platforms, image what will happen if Trump wins the presidency?

Krugman again: “Your vote matters, and you should act accordingly—which means thinking seriously about what you want to see happen to America.”








photo from pixabay.com
Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Sunday, August 28, 2016

Red tape? Think state and local regs….


 The standard campaign watchword is “reduce government regulations and red tape that hurts businesses,” or, in throwaway stump speech language: “Get rid of job-killing regulations!”

Most of the time, the target is federal regs.


However, Katherine Rampell at WashingtonPost.com says wait a minute, look elsewhere:
“…if you talk with entrepreneurs, you’ll learn that — with the major exception of our criminally convoluted [federal] tax system — the most burdensome barriers to their efforts often don’t originate with the feds.”

Instead, she points to state and local regs governing occupational licensing, business licensing, registrations, permitting, hiring, overtime pay, zoning, insurance, size of the business sign, parking….



Don’t get me wrong. I’m in favor of government at all levels regulating the conduct of business operations. I’m happy that somebody somewhere is supposed to be checking on hazardous waste disposal, honest payment of overtime, hiring discrimination, product quality, on-the-job safety….





Here’s another note that isn’t often mentioned: Rampell points out that “Powerful industry groups and other organizations also have a vested interest in preserving barriers to entry, which is one reason so few occupations ever get de-licensed.” There are plenty of regulations that plenty of businesses love to have imposed on real and potential competitors.

Are some government regulations out-of-date, poorly written, poorly enforced, just plain dumb….? Sure.

We should talk about fixing all the problems with business regs, not about getting rid of them.










Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, August 19, 2016

avoir soif….toujours


Try to forget this factoid:
Most of Earth’s water is undrinkable, and most of the drinkable stuff is inaccessible—permanently.

Our customary sources of drinking water—rivers and streams—hold only six-thousandths of 1 percent of all potable water. The rest is in polar ice caps, glaciers, aquifers and lakes (most of them inconveniently located for most human beings).


Think about what global warming might do to surface water supplies around the world.

Stocking up on bottled water is a short-term solution.





Source:
Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and Civilization by Steven Solomon
New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2010

Reviewed on DelanceyPlace.com











Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

We’re cooking the planet (part 14)



Last year was the warmest year on record, and this year is likely to be hotter.

That’s just the plain facts, says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The New York Times says the NOAA report “is a powerful reason for rich countries to begin making good on their promises to help low-lying island nations, some of the poorest countries in the world, build their defenses against the disastrous effects of climate change, which some are already experiencing.”

The key words here—the devastating truth—is that global climate change is happening now in a progressive pattern. Translation: even if humans could magically stop polluting the atmosphere today, global warming will continue to get worse for many years….global climate change will continue to make our lives more costly and more vulnerable.

The simple recipe is: we have to stop using coal, we have to tax carbon emissions and we have to start using a whole lot more energy from alternative sources. Of course, of course, that’s easier said than done, but we must act smarter. Our inaction will cause our grandchildren to suffer.


Already, some mid-ocean island nations are visibly being submerged by rising ocean levels.

Already, droughts are becoming more intense in Africa and in the Middle East.

The August 8 item in the New York Times spells out the bottom line:
“While the world ponders ways to reduce emissions, the consequences of climate change are already underway.”









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Sunday, March 6, 2016

“Opinion” isn’t relevant….



Kronebreen Glacier in northern Norway
This is what global warming looks like....


Robert Frost had no inkling of global climate change when he published “Fire and Ice” in 1920:
“Some say the world will end in fire…”









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Sunday, January 31, 2016

I didn’t bother on Thursday night


About 225 million grownups in America didn’t watch the Republican debate or He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named last Thursday night. I was one of them.

The audience for the GOP debate on Fox was 12.5 million, about 5% of adults in the U.S. Roughly 2.7 million—about 1%--tuned in to the DJT event benefitting military veterans.

The rest of us were doing other things: hoping the next president will use the full powers of the Oval Office to do good things for America, like improving education, boosting infrastructure investment and creating jobs, reducing carbon emissions to tackle the global climate change horror, increasing taxes on the very wealthy, taking steps to fight the greedy power of corporations and Wall Street….




You fill in the hopes I forgot to mention….














Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

We’re cooking the planet (part 13)


We’ve already inflicted long-term damage to the atmosphere of our planet, and we piled it on last year:

Scientists have confirmed that 2015 was the hottest year on record in the 136 years that useful records have been kept.


We have to take immediate steps to shut down coal mines and phase out the use of dirty, dangerous coal. We need to make gasoline-powered vehicles much more efficient. We need to require that users pay the true economic cost of creating pollution. We need to continue expanding our use of renewable energy.

This is the only planet our grandchildren will have to live on.

Let’s do everything we can do to clean it up.








Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Big Oil spins the $1.1 trillion spending/tax deal


Many Republicans and a few Democrats are whooping it up because part of the deal-making for the recent $1.1 trillion spending/tax package was tossing out the 40-year-old ban on U. S. exports of crude oil.

Let’s dig into this one.


This move to open the gates for American companies to export oil doesn’t help America. It doesn’t improve our energy independence. This isn’t a bold step to mitigate ongoing global climate change.

It’s good for the companies that own crude in America. Now they’re going to get a chance to sell it overseas where they can get a better price for it.


Joe and Jane America aren’t getting any piece of that action.

That’s it, folks.

End of story.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

A good step


Almost 200 nations agreed in Paris to actually do real things to start remediating the dangers of ongoing global climate change. It’s a good step forward. That’s all it is.

This agreement doesn’t “solve” global climate change and the ongoing global warming that is going to cause fantastically expensive environmental and commercial and infrastructure damage in the coming decades.

It’s a good step forward because it’s the first time essentially all of the world’s nations have signed on. The United States and China—the world’s two worst polluters—are leading the way.

This agreement is the work of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference. This should open your eyes to the frame of reference for this work: it was the 21st annual session of the Conference of the Parties to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.


One could argue it’s not much to show for more than 20 years of work.

I’m taking a positive view.

It’s a good step forward.

Dealing with climate change is going to cost the nations of the world more money and grief than anyone can currently imagine.

No time like the present to get started.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

It’s not in the cards


We’d save a lot of time and money—and put a dent in global disappointments—if we would just stop trying to predict the future.

I’m not talking about refusing to claim that the sun will rise in the east next Tuesday.

I’m not talking about the meteorologist who forecasts that it will rain in the Chicago area in the next six hours.

I’m not talking about the guy who says “My wife isn’t going to like this one bit.”

I’m not talking about treating worsening global climate change as a life-threatening certainty.


I’m talking about predicting a bear market on Wall Street. I’m talking about the jabbering about who’s going to be the Republican presidential nominee. I’m talking about experts who insist on predicting next month’s employment figures.

It’s just not possible to forecast a contingent future event with any precision. Too many variables. 
Too many unknowables.





A few years ago Philip Tetlock (Expert Political Judgment, 2005) analyzed 82,361 predictions offered by 284 acclaimed “experts” in various fields, including journalism, economics and political science.

His findings: about 15 percent of the events classified as “no way” actually happened, and roughly 27 percent of the “oh yeah, bet on it” events somehow didn’t become reality. In a New York Times book review, Tetlock was quoted saying these “experts” did about as well as “a dart-throwing chimp.” I’ll rub it in by mentioning that the chimps will work for bananas.

Most of the “experts” who forecast next month’s national employment numbers get it wrong every single month.

Why do we keep paying attention to them?

Why do we keep paying the “experts” to make wrong guesses about the future?







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.

Monday, August 17, 2015

Energy company profits are simply theft


If fossil fuel energy companies actually paid the true economic costs of their business, they wouldn’t be profitable.

Another way to say this is: Big Energy is making big profits because it isn’t paying the pass-along costs of global climate change. You’re paying these costs, and your grandchildren will pay them, too.

The pass-along costs are what economists call the “external costs” of producing energy, namely, the dreadful and rapidly worsening impact of greenhouse gases and global climate change and global warming. The energy companies largely escape paying for this environmental damage. That means that somebody else—everybody else—has to pay for it.

Every person in the world and every business and every government is paying these costs, in addition to buying coal and gas and electricity from fossil fuels.

Some basic data has been analyzed by the International Monetary Fund and by the University of Cambridge, click here.

Think of the payment of these external costs as a global subsidy to the energy companies. The IMF estimates the magnitude is more than $5 trillion per year.

The folks at University of Cambridge calculate that coal companies, for example, pass on such economic costs to society that are 200-900 percent higher than their reported profits.

We need a worldwide tax on carbon emissions, paid directly by the companies and consumers that create and benefit from them. We need it now, because we're cooking the planet.



Our grandchildren will be living on this planet. Let’s start cleaning it up.















Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.

Thursday, July 30, 2015

“Oceanfront property”…..uh oh


A new report on climate change includes this devastating wake-up item:

Almost 130 million Americans live in a coastal county with a salt water shoreline.

Nearly half of Americans are more or less on the front lines of the coming-your-way calamities tied to global climate change, like rising sea levels and higher-than-normal storm surges.


Almost 2.5 million Americans own homes that are less than four feet above the current high tide line—that’s about 1.3 million homes that are going to be uninhabitable soon. Check to see if your bank owns any of those mortgages. Ask your insurance company how many homeowner’s policies it has on those homes.

If the sea level rises three feet, big chunks of waterfront property in Boston will cease being waterfront property, because, you know….

Worldwide, almost 650 million people live less than 30 feet above sea level.

In plenty of places around the world, in the next couple decades, there are plenty of people who will no longer have to “go to the beach,” because the beach is coming to them.







It only gets uglier....

Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2015 All rights reserved.

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Book review: The Climate Casino


Book review: The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World
Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2013
378 pages

I think Prof. Nordhaus has given us a remarkable achievement: a solid, sobering, stimulating, scientific, scary book on human-caused global climate change, that leaves no room for doubt about the prospect that climate change deniers are going to sweat more, like the rest of us, in coming decades.


This is not a book about Apocalypse. If anything, the Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale University writes with an even temper and drily matter-of-fact language that is a teensy bit annoying, given the massively dangerous, initial impacts of climate change and global warming that are already unavoidable.



I think the principal value of The Climate Casino is that Nordhaus lays out the economic (cost/benefit) framework of policy considerations and possible remedial steps that the nations of the world, and mankind, can take to deal with the fact that we’re putting too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

In simplest terms, he says there are many things we can do to mitigate global warming….some are more costly than others and some are very expensive….some folks and some companies and some countries will have to pay more of the costs than others.

I was surprised to read his conclusion that humans can likely survive the initial moderate impacts of global climate change/warming without substantial social and economic disruption, if we start seriously working on it now—there is a big pricetag, but we can tolerate it.

(I mention, for the record, that Nordhaus carefully discusses the unpredictable, and more than trivially possible, catastrophic “tipping points” in climate disruption that might occur regardless of what we do or don’t do—think Dennis Quaid and “The Day After Tomorrow”).

We’re going to have to stop using coal around the world, or figure out how to burn it cleanly. And more generally, we’re going to have to figure out how to require companies and individuals to pay the true cost of burning fossil fuels, that is, the present and future cost of the damage those fuels cause to our environment and to our grandchildren’s prospects for survival.

It was remotely heartening to read Nordhaus’ estimate that we have a reasonable chance of dealing with global warming if we get the ball rolling now, and make sure everyone pays the price.



This is the only planet our grandchildren will have to live on. We must do the right thing for them.











http://barleyliterate.blogspot.com/2013/02/mother-nature-owns-it.html

Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2014 All rights reserved.