Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

Monday, December 19, 2016

Speak truth to Trump


and sign up for daily email alerts so you can
keep getting this daily reminder about my poetry, book reviews
and other blog posts. Thanks!


The Peaceful Resistance Army

Speaking truth to Trump….

Read the full post with pictures on my new website:

Monday, November 7, 2016

The media giveaway helped Trump



The media grabbed profits, gave Trump $2 billion of free air time, and gave up any pretense of presenting objective news as a public service.

Read the full post on my new website:

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Trump blackout?



Here’s my thought: why are the media continuing to report anything that Trump says?

The situation is:
Much of what Trump says are lies.

He says one thing and then he says the opposite, repeatedly.

Just about everything Trump says is bluster, untroubled by facts, details or reality.

Trump says the same things, over and over and over.

Just about all of his senior staffers and “surrogates” try to say—day after day after day—that he really doesn’t mean what he says.

Here’s my thought: the media should completely stop reporting what Trump says, until he says something that’s new, true, civil, and meaningfully detailed….and says it for, say, three or four days in a row.




Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

“Pants on fire!”….



Just so we keep things in perspective:

We don’t even have to remind ourselves that Trump tells a lie more or less every five minutes while he’s talking….

David Leonhardt of the New York Times reminds us that “Remarkably, every Republican presidential candidate this year was untruthful more often than every Democratic candidate, according to the watchdog PolitiFact (which was trying so hard to be neutral that it didn’t point out the pattern!).”

Of course Hillary and Tim have stretched the literal truth more than once. I wish it weren’t so.


Leonhardt’s point is that the Republican candidates have defined themselves by telling lies, again and again.

Promise yourself that you’re telling the truth when you say “I’m going to vote on November 8.”







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Better than releasing Trump’s tax returns



Trump’s hiding stuff by refusing to release his tax returns. We all know that.

The New York Times says that Trump and all his companies have pulled in at least $885 million in “tax breaks, grants and other subsidies” in New York for all of his real estate projects.

Here’s my idea: if Trump pays back the whole $885 million before November 8, I’ll stop clamoring for him to release his tax returns.

The guy’s worth billions, right? Does anybody think he couldn’t afford to do that?

The payback wouldn’t make him presidential material, but it would be the right thing to do.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Another legal way to stop Trump




Count on Garrison Keillor (the Lake Wobegon guy) to bring a fresh perspective to the current dangerous corruption of our political process. At WashingtonPost.com, he wrote:

“A week ago, a panhandler in Times Square sat holding a sign reading, ‘Give me a dollar or I’ll vote for Trump,’ and people laughed and reached into their pockets. His bucket overflowed.”


Keep a few singles in your pocket in case you walk past that guy or someone he’s talked to.












Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Don’t vote for Johnson or Stein “to make a statement”



Paul Krugman laid it right out in yesterday’s New York Times:
"Nobody cares” if you vote for Johnson or Stein on November 8 because you want to raise the middle digit to "the system."

Krugman’s key point: Clinton or Trump will be the next president of the United
States, so “don’t vote for a minor-party candidate [just] to make a statement. Nobody cares.”

Rightly enough, he says that if you really think Johnson or Stein, and the platforms of the Libertarian  Party or the Green Party, are right for America and they should have the power of the presidency, then by all means vote for one of them.

But. Seriously.

Krugman bets that many Johnson/Stein supporters are mostly anti-Trump/anti-Clinton kinds of people, who haven’t read those party platforms and really haven’t thought through the consequences of Johnson or Stein getting to redecorate the Oval Office.

Here’s Krugman summarizing the Libertarian platform:
“…it calls for abolition of the income tax and the privatization of almost everything the government does, including education. What really struck me, however, was what the platform says about the environment.
It opposes any kind of regulation; instead, it argues that we can rely on the courts. Is a giant corporation poisoning the air you breathe or the water you drink? Just sue: ‘Where dam­ages can be proven and quantified in a court of law, restitution to the injured parties must be required.’ Ordinary citizens against teams of high-priced corporate lawyers — what could go wrong?”

Here’s my simple summary of the Green platform:
It's chock full of really good, really feel-good, and mostly unrealistic ideas that have nothing in particular to do with world trade or job creation or infrastructure investment or effective regulation of the financial markets or health care reform or bipartisan government or…..

Neither Johnson nor Stein is going to win the election.

If you strongly endorse elements of either or both of these platforms, image what will happen if Trump wins the presidency?

Krugman again: “Your vote matters, and you should act accordingly—which means thinking seriously about what you want to see happen to America.”








photo from pixabay.com
Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

“Kabuki citizenship” isn’t the worst of it….



The continuing self-degradation of the media is enabling, in all too obvious ways, the shipwreck of our public discourse on politics and government.

The advent of Trump’s nativist demagoguery—and the media’s willing role in keeping him on life support—has largely legitimized the public expression of prejudicial fears and hatred and bigotry that we know have always existed, but which have been at least nominally derided by decent and/or “politically correct” folks.

The New York Times’ Wesley Morris highlighted a specific element of it yesterday in his commentary on “Who Gets to Be Called a ‘Patriot’?”  Read it here.

Morris digs in to the doctrinaire spew of the folks who lead the charge in disputing the patriotism of folks who have a different skin color or a different religion or a different political stance or a birth certificate that was signed in another country….

Such despicable bias gets all too much air time and, thus, all too much credibility among folks whose powers of reasoning too often aren’t used for full effect.



Morris offers this zinger: “As a result, modern patriotism has become Kabuki citizenship.”

The masks and the make-believe and the stylized exaggerations of sentiment are meant to be instruments of entertainment….

…not the bling of the horrifying world of Twitter morality and anonymously obscene commenters who hide behind ad hominem attacks……



















Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Friday, September 9, 2016

The umbrella thing….



This is a little weasly, I admit it, it’s not a reason to do anything or change your mind about who to vote for on Nov. 8.

I noticed this candid picture of Trump and Pamela Bondi (Florida Attorney General). It was raining. 

They were walking together, Trump was holding the umbrella. Good show, that’s what a guy is supposed to do.



Who’s walking with the brolly centered over his head? Who’s squeezed out to the side, getting rained on?

You know what’s wrong here.
















Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Sunday, September 4, 2016

Media “fairness” is bogus


I’ve been noticing this in the past several weeks. Maybe you have, too.

The media, after finally getting around to actively and explicitly reporting the grotesquely negative aspects of Trump’s presidential campaign, are spending more or less “equal time” grinding away at the Clinton campaign.

Example: a few days ago TheNation.com reported “Hillary Clinton’s [August 25] speech on the racial bigotry and white grievance that pollutes Donald Trump’s campaign should turn out to be the most consequential address of the campaign, even of the decade.”

You can agree or disagree about how notable the speech was, but there’s no denying that Trump is ringing so many bells that encourage public display and, in effect, legitimize public expression of hatred and bigotry against our fellow Americans who don’t have white skin.

In response, Trump said and tweeted repeatedly that Clinton is “a bigot.” No details, just that dastardly epithet.

Now, Joan Walsh at TheNation.com goes on, “…you can dislike Clinton’s speech. You can fact-check it, and perhaps find something wrong—although to my knowledge nobody claimed any inaccuracy. But what you really shouldn’t do, if you are a journalist of any kind of conscience or capacity, is act as though Clinton had somehow gotten down in the gutter with Trump—merely by describing what Trump is doing.


“Yet that’s the kind of coverage we got. Some commenters got it right, but the reporters and editors charged with “objectivity” immediately equated Clinton’s clear-eyed exegesis of Trump’s racially divisive campaign with Trump’s calling her a “bigot.” The Washington Post headlined its story: “Clinton, Trump exchange racially charged accusations.” Bloomberg went with “Trump and Clinton trade charges of racism.” Lots of outlets went for the more colorful metaphor of “barbs:” The Huffington Post, Fox News, CNBC, and the Financial Times all went with some version of “Clinton, Trump trade barbs on race.”

....and on and on....Shame on American media for hyping their coverage of the campaign for audience ratings points, and for trying to cover their tracks by foolishly and fecklessly giving “fairness” a bad name.

I don’t believe there’s a “media conspiracy” favoring either the right or the left.

I do believe that almost all of the media are doing a crappy job. This is congruence, not conspiracy. It’s worse than conspiracy.










Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016  All rights reserved.

Monday, August 22, 2016

Take soap to a Trump rally


New York Times reporters have been recording what some of our fellow Americans have been saying as they stand in the crowds at Trump rallies.

It’s disgusting, and I think it’s a dangerous portent.

“Build a wall—kill them all” is probably the nicest sentiment captured on tape.

Quite a few of the others illustrate how readily a segment of the electorate uses the F-bomb and “bitch” to characterize a candidate for president of the United States.

Trump won’t shut it down.


This is a menacing reality in our democracy.

Too many mouths are unclean at a Trump rally.











Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Monday, August 15, 2016

Does Trump care about losing the election?



Caveat:  Trump tells lies all the time, so he has no credibility.

So this is just a “take a minute and think about it” thing, no prediction or anything, not even a hope really, just sayin’….

I think a few days ago Trump said he really doesn’t care if he wins or loses the election, because if he loses, he said, “I go back to a very good way of life.”

“At the end, it’s either going to work or I’m going to have a very, very nice long vacation,” Trump told CNBC.

Does that sound like Trump thinks this whole primary/general election thing is more or less taking America out for a spin, something to keep on doing between now and November 8?



What about saying something like: “If I lose, I’ll continue to do everything I can, every day, to stand up for the Americans who have supported me.”

Or how about: “If I lose, I’ve made a real commitment to do all the things that have to be done to make American great again, and you can count on me to keep on fighting.”

OK, back to reality.

Talk amongst yourselves.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Trump tells lies—all the time


Journalistic “objectivity” shouldn’t be a rationale for indifference to the truth.

Lots of media reports and pundits are talking about Trump’s recent economic speech and all of his talking points that just aren’t true.

Here’s my summary: it was full of lies, and we all know it.

Why are we hearing endless news reports and commentary about Trump’s “policies” and his “campaign reset” and his “tax programs” and his promises to “renegotiate the trade deals”?




Why aren’t we hearing, instead, endless reminders that Trump’s speech was a mess of deception and a pack of lies?

I’m waiting for Joe Scarborough or somebody to say “Trump lied left and right during his big economic speech, and that’s all I need to say about it.”

Before the speech in Detroit, Nicholas Kristof wrote in a Sunday New York Times column that “Trump is a world champion who is pathological in his dishonesty.”

More from Kristof:
“In March, Politico chronicled a week of Trump remarks and found on average one misstatement every five minutes. The Huffington Post once chronicled 71 inaccuracies in an hourlong town hall session—more than one a minute.”


Really, no reasonable person can trust anything Trump says. Let’s start mentioning that all the time.









More links to reports on Trump’s “fact-challenged assertions”:










Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Trump’s economic advisers: the 1%



Trump announced his economic advisory team yesterday…I guess it reveals the real Trump.

He named 13 men—he couldn’t find a single woman with economic savvy?

They’re all rich, big time. Like Trump. No middle class economists in the bunch. And no union leaders, either.

These guys are bankers, hedge fund managers, real estate speculators….

They have the money and the motive to buy influence in Washington, in state governments….

Aren’t these some of the guys who love the big international trade deals that Trump loves to spit on?

Aren’t these some of the guys who run “the system” that Trump incessantly claims is rigged?


What part of America do they represent? Do they speak for the little guy who has fears about his livelihood, his family, his future?

No reasonable person can believe anything Trump says.









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Fear….something new



I don’t think that, in all my previous life, I’ve been frightened about the possible outcome of the November presidential election. Now I am.

I’m going to vote for Hillary Clinton, the un-perfect candidate who will do some good for America.



You should vote for Clinton or Trump, because one of them will be the next president of the United States.

Don’t let everybody else decide.

















Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Mindless media hype


Who watched the TV broadcasts of the Republican and Democratic conventions?

The short answer is: not too many people

More than 85% of adults in America didn’t bother to watch either of the nominees giving the big acceptance speech.



Fox News had the biggest average audience for all eight nights of the Republican and Democratic conventions—but, hold on, only 1.8% of adults were watching Fox on a given night.





Possibly we’re having the most emotionally charged presidential election of all time—Tom Jefferson and Andy Jackson and Teddy Roosevelt didn’t have television to deal with. It’s scarcely credible, but nevertheless, most Americans didn’t give a hoot about watching those big speeches. Obviously, most Americans didn’t learn anything much from them.



For the seeming endless hours of convention coverage by the broadcast and cable channels, much of the time only a tiny minority of Americans was watching, regardless of the pompous blather of Wolf and Rachel and Megyn and all the others.



While I’m on this topic, I’ll give a thumbs down to TheHill.com, which blasted this headline on its website yesterday: “Trump tops Clinton on speech ratings” and to TheHill writer Joe Concha, who started his story with “Donald Trump has defeated Hillary Clinton…” The underlying details tell a much less provocative story.

Here’s the detail: Trump had a reported audience of 34.9 million people, and Clinton’s audience was 33.3 million. The audience ratings are reported from a survey sample of about 5,000 viewers. I have long experience in the design of surveys, and I feel real comfortable guessing that the margin of error in this audience report makes it ludicrous to say one candidate “tops” another, or one candidate “has defeated” another. The viewing audience for Trump and Clinton was close to being the same, probably no significant difference between them.

In their convention coverage, the media generally didn’t take any opportunity to minimize the hype or the preposterous emphasis on discord.







Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

A few words about the convention coverage


Media coverage of the two political conventions has been:


Vacuous

Hyped beyond recognition

Disdainful of sensible public interest



I’m not getting my hopes up for the campaign coverage.









Copyright © Richard Carl Subber 2016 All rights reserved.